Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 31.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Radiol. 2011 Apr 13;79(2):e58–e62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.059

Fig. 2 — CT scans of a 19 year-old-woman with abdominal pain after bone marrow transplantation. The first CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed with oral water, and the bowel segments (arrows) in the scout (A) and transverse CT image (C) do not show the presence of positive enteric contrast material. The CTDIvol was 9.0mGy. The second CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed seven days later with positive enteric contrast material, which can be seen in the bowel segments (arrows) in the scout (B) and transverse CT image (D). The CTDIvol was 10.5mGy (16.7% higher than the first exam). No cause for abdominal pain was identified on either scan.

Fig. 2 — CT scans of a 19 year-old-woman with abdominal pain after bone marrow transplantation. The first CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed with oral water, and the bowel segments (arrows) in the scout (A) and transverse CT image (C) do not show the presence of positive enteric contrast material. The CTDIvol was 9.0mGy. The second CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed seven days later with positive enteric contrast material, which can be seen in the bowel segments (arrows) in the scout (B) and transverse CT image (D). The CTDIvol was 10.5mGy (16.7% higher than the first exam). No cause for abdominal pain was identified on either scan.