Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar 10;23(8):659–666. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002494

Table 2.

Relationship between lupus disease activity and quality of care, with and without adjustment for disease status, health services and sociodemographic characteristics.

Characteristic Increase in SLAQ by 4 or more points (≥ 0.5 standard deviation)
Bivariable Results Multivariable Results
Year-to-year First-last Year-to-year First-last
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
High quality care (at least 85% of QMs met) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.6, 1.6) 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) 0.9 (0.5, 1.4)
Number of quality measures eligible for in baseline year
  2-3 ref ref ref ref
  4-6 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.1 (0.7, 1.7) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 1.2 (0.8, 1.9)
  7-11 1.4 (1.03, 1.8) * 1.2 (0.8, 2.0) 1.5 (1.1, 2.2) * 1.6 (0.9, 2.9)
Number of visits in baseline year (1-41) 1.01 (1.0, 1.0) * 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 1.02 (1.0, 1.0) * 1.0 (1.0, 1.0)
Baseline BILD score 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) * 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) * 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) * 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) *
Baseline SLAQ score 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) * 0.9 (0.9, 1.0) * 0.9 (0.9, 1.0) *
Disease duration, per 10 years 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.9 (0.7, 1.1)
Male 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) 1.3 (0.6, 2.7) 1.1 (0.7, 1.7) 1.7 (0.8, 3.6)
Age, per 10 years 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) * 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) * 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Nonwhite race or Hispanic ethnicity 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3)
Education
 High school or less 1.6 (1.2, 2.1) * 1.5 (0.9, 2.5) 1.6 (1.2, 2.3) * 1.8 (1.0, 3.0) *
 Some post secondary, no BA/BS 1.8 (1.4, 2.2) * 1.5 (1.0, 2.3) * 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) * 1.8 (1.2, 2.7) *
 Bachelors degree or beyond ref ref ref ref
Health Insurance Source and Type
  Private 0.8 (0.6, 1.0) 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) 1.1 (0.7, 1.6)
  Enrolled in HMO 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 1.2 (0.9, 1.8) 1.2 (1.0, 1.6) 1.4 (0.9, 2.1)
Saw rheumatologist in baseline year 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 0.8 (0.5, 1.2) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.8 (0.5, 1.3)
Saw generalist in baseline year 1.8 (1.3, 2.5) * 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 1.9 (1.3, 2.7) * 1.0 (0.6, 1.7)

An increase of ≥ 0.5 standard deviation in the SLAQ score was observed in 155 of 737 participants (21%), and in 405 of 2,251 observations (18%).

*

p<0.05

SLAQ=systemic lupus activity questionnaire, QM=quality measure, BILD=brief index of lupus damage, HMO=health maintenance organization.

Multivariable models control for all variables above, as well as time between baseline and follow-up interviews.

For annual change in SLAQ, generalized estimating equation (GEE) methods were used to account for repeated measures.

Uninsured (22 participants, 53 observations) included in referent categories for both variables.