Table 3. Analysis of variance between samples grouping into the three different bacterial community types.
| Taxon | p-value | average relative abundance [%] | ||
| LM1 [Q] | HM [H] | LM2 [S] | ||
| Quinella | 5.1×10−54 | 32.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Sharpea azabuensis | 1.7×10−31 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 11.9 |
| Olsenella | 1.3×10−18 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 |
| Ruminococcaceae | 2.2×10−17 | 4.3 | 6.9 | 3.4 |
| Fibrobacter succinogenes | 1.5×10−14 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 9.1 |
| Clostridiales | 3.3×10−12 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 3.3 |
| Prevotella bryantii | 1.6×10−11 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.7 |
| Lachnospiraceae | 2.3×10−11 | 7.0 | 10.7 | 8.6 |
| Prevotella | 9.4×10−11 | 17.6 | 27.1 | 22.9 |
| Bacteroidales | 3.4×10−9 | 9.2 | 14.0 | 11.1 |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 1.2×10−8 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Catabacteriaceae | 2.4×10−7 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Kandleria vitulina | 7.9×10−5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.6 |
| Coprococcus | 4.7×10−3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| Fibrobacter intestinalis | 7.4×10−3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 |
| Ruminococcus | 3.2×10−2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
Bonferroni-corrected p-values for significance (at 0.05 criterion) of bacterial taxa were obtained by performing ANOVA on the samples grouping into the three different bacterial community types: LM1 [ruminotype Q], HM [ruminotype H], and LM2 [ruminotype S]. Mean relative abundances of significant bacterial taxa in the three different bacterial community types are presented. Only significant taxa that contributed in average ≥1% to the total bacterial community in at least one community type are shown.