Table 4.
Markers | Haplotype | Frequency | OR (Alternative) |
OR (Null) |
Sub-Null P | Null P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs2274736–rs7147796 | CC | 0.029 | ref | ref | 0.2660 | 0.0244 |
TC | 0.454 | 1.11 | ref | |||
CG | 0.312 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.0188 | ||
TG | 0.206 | 1.06 | 0.91 | |||
rs2401756–rs7147796 | AC | 0.029 | ref | ref | 0.3290 | 0.0227 |
GC | 0.454 | 1.10 | ref | |||
AG | 0.311 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.0143 | ||
GG | 0.206 | 1.05 | 0.91 |
In these conditional analyses, the null hypothesis is that the haplotypes having the same alleles at the conditioned locus, the second locus, rs7147796, have same effect on disease risk. The alternative hypothesis is that all haplotypes may have different disease risks. The sub-null hypothesis tests whether the two haplotypes sharing the conditioned allele have the same disease risks. Significant P values are shown in bold.