Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 12;472(9):2680–2690. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3557-2

Table 2.

Subjective and objective assessment results and complications

Patient Complications Subjective assessment scores Objective assessment scores
Lysholm score (points) Tegner activity level (0–10) IKDC objective score ROM (°) KT1000™ difference* (mm) Single-hop distance (%)* 6-m timed hop (%)* Triple-hop distance (%)* Crossover hop distance (%)* Global PT average (%)*
Involved Uninvolved 20° 70°
Extension Flexion Extension Flexion
1 None; revision case: failed initial reconstruction done elsewhere 100 5 (heavy labor) C 0 137 5 138 0 1.8 95 100 91 99 96
2 Arthrofibrosis requiring MUA 72 4 (moderate labor) D 0 110 0 138 4.5 5.2 57 65 60 83 66
3 None 93 5 (heavy labor) B 2 122 0 135 5.7 3.3 101 86 73 84 86
4 Reinjury with revision ACL reconstruction 80 4 (moderate labor) B 0 136 0 140 2.5 2.3 102 79 100 106 97
5 Hardware removal, lateral release 58 2 (light labor) C 4 117 0 138 0.3 0.3 87 67 84 79
6 None 85 6 (recreational sports) B 11 114 10 123 2.8 3.5 41 36 78 82 59
7 None 94 6 (recreational sports) B 0 106 −1 116 0.8 2.3 98 100 93 105 99
8 None 63 7 (jumping sports)
Patient Imaging
Kellgren-Lawrence grade Difference in PCL laxity on lateral stress radiographs (mm)*
Involved Uninvolved
1 II 0 1
2 0 0
3 0 0 9
4 III 0 6
5 III 0 3
6 III 0 2
7 I 0 8
8

* Compared to uninvolved side; global PT average = average of scores from combined physical therapy tests; MUA = manipulation under anesthesia.