Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;78(5):697–716. doi: 10.1002/msj.20294

Table 3.

Persistent Protection of FAHF-2 Against PN Induced Anaphylaxis

Challenge
(Time–
Point)
PNA/Sham PNA/FAHF-2 Naïve
Individual
Score
(N=12–13)
Median
Score
Individual
Score
(N=8)
Median
Score
Individual
Score
(N=5–10)
Scores
Median
1st (W14) 13/13 (2–4) 3 0/8 (0) 0* 0/5 (0) 0
2nd (W18) 13/13 (3–4) 4 0/8 (0) 0* 0/5 (0) 0
3rd (W22) 13/13 (3–4) 4 0/8 (0) 0* NC ND
4th (W28) 13/13 (2–4) 4 0/8 (0) 0* NC ND
5th (W34) 13/13 (3–4) 4 0/8 (0) 0* NC ND
6th (W40) 13-13 (3–5) 4 0/8 (0) 0* NC ND
7th (W50) 12/12 (3–4) 4 3/8 (0–2) 0* 0/10(0) 0

Anaphylactic signs were evaluated 30 minutes following oral challenge utilizing the scoring system previously described in table I. Sham, PN allergic mice fed water; FAHF-2, food allergy herbal formula -2. P<0.05 vs Sham.