Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Glycoconj J. 2014 Apr 22;31(4):299–307. doi: 10.1007/s10719-014-9522-1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A and B: Electrostatic surfaces of Robo1 and Robo1-GFP modeling using MOE 13.08 and the AMBER99 forcefield with 0.15 salt at 25°C. The values of surface charges at pH 7.4 were estimated: Robo1 = -1.9; Robo1-GFP = -10.0. C and D: Intrinsic protein disorder and flexibility prediction based on protein sequences of Robo1 and Robo1-GFP using the protein prediction program from PredictProtein (www.predictprotein.org). Yellow bars: predicted disordered/flexible regions using the protocol from [33]; Green bars: predicted disordered/flexible regions using the protocol from [34].