TABLE 2.
Between-Group Differences on Mean Fractional Anisotropy Within Atlas-Based Regions-Of-Interesta
| Fractional Anisotropy | Comparison Subjects – Patients (df=105)
|
Comparison Subjects – Siblings (df=101)
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | p | pFDR | t | p | pFDR | |
| Forceps major and minor | 1.88 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.27 |
| Fornix | 2.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 1.13 | 0.26 | 0.68 |
| Uncinate fasciculus | 1.29 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.68 |
| Cingulum bundle | 2.31 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.68 |
| Cingulum hippocampal | 3.07 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.68 |
| Posterior thalamic radiations | 3.64 | 0.0004 | 0.004 | 1.98 | 0.05 | 0.25 |
| Anterior limb of internal capsule | 2.30 | 0.024 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| Posterior limb of internal capsule | 2.16 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.68 |
| Retrolenticular internal capsule | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
| External capsule | 2.77 | 0.007 | 0.02 | 1.42 | 0.16 | 0.58 |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus | 3.37 | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 0.68 |
FDR=false-discovery rate.