Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 1;170(11):1317–1325. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12111462

TABLE 2.

Between-Group Differences on Mean Fractional Anisotropy Within Atlas-Based Regions-Of-Interesta

Fractional Anisotropy Comparison Subjects – Patients (df=105)
Comparison Subjects – Siblings (df=101)
t p pFDR t p pFDR
Forceps major and minor 1.88 0.06 0.08 2.00 0.05 0.27
Fornix 2.06 0.04 0.06 1.13 0.26 0.68
Uncinate fasciculus 1.29 0.20 0.22 0.56 0.58 0.68
Cingulum bundle 2.31 0.02 0.04 0.64 0.52 0.68
Cingulum hippocampal 3.07 0.003 0.01 0.73 0.47 0.68
Posterior thalamic radiations 3.64 0.0004 0.004 1.98 0.05 0.25
Anterior limb of internal capsule 2.30 0.024 0.04 0.02 0.98 0.98
Posterior limb of internal capsule 2.16 0.03 0.05 0.63 0.53 0.68
Retrolenticular internal capsule 0.58 0.56 0.56 0.50 0.62 0.68
External capsule 2.77 0.007 0.02 1.42 0.16 0.58
Superior longitudinal fasciculus 3.37 0.001 0.006 0.99 0.33 0.68
a

FDR=false-discovery rate.