Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):133–144. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0465-3

Table 4.

Predictive Validity: Partial Correlations between Diffusion Measures and Substance Use Diffusion

Traditional Analytic Measures

1 Year Follow-up
2 Year Follow-up
Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest
Participation Rate 0.26 0.20 0.45** 0.43**
Representativeness
Demographic Representativeness
 Gender −0.30 −0.17 0.19 0.09
 Free Lunch 0.19 −0.10 −0.14 −0.17
Behavioral Representativeness
 Grades −0.04 0.35* −0.26 0.36*
 Delinquency −0.03 0.13 0.05 0.05
 Substance Use Attitudes 0.21 −0.13 0.17 −0.37*
Average Representativeness −0.02 −0.03 −0.06 0.16
SNA Measures

1 Year Follow-up
2 Year Follow-up
Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest
Social Integration
Connectivity
 Structural Cohesion −0.08 0.35* 0.30 0.57***
 Social Distance −0.20 0.34 0.15 0.28
Clustering
 Segregation Index 0.16 −0.20 −0.13 −0.36*
 Transitivity Ratio −0.09 −0.31 −0.22 −0.53***
Hierarchy
 Indegree Centralization −0.31 −0.46** −0.25 −0.09
 Betweenness Centralization −0.26 0.05 0.20 0.04
Location of the intervention participants
Distribution of Participants across the Network
 Prop. of Groups with 1+ Part. 0.01 0.13 0.19 0.25
 Prop. within 2 Steps of a Part. −0.03 0.13 0.36* 0.45**
Participants’ Relative Status
 Indegree 0.09 0.09 −0.06 0.02
 Betweenness 0.04 0.09 −0.44* 0.12
Global Network Index 0.36* 0.49** 0.09 0.35*

Note. Prop = proportion; Part = Intervention participant. Substance use diffusion was defined as −1*(absolute difference in substance use between participants and non-participants), such that higher scores = higher diffusion. All analyses partial out network size and survey participation rate at either the 1-year or 2-year follow-up and substance use representativeness at either pretest or posttest. All analyses except for participation rate also controlled for SFP10-14 participation rate.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.