Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 28;7:409. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-409

Table 4.

The effect of living in CH on prevalence of depression (GDS) among elderly

Characteristics of elderly study participants Total number (%) Number (%) depressed Crude OR (95%CI) Partially adjusted OR (95%)*
Location
 
 
 
 
Community
108(76.6)
34(31.5)
Ref
Ref
CH
33(23.4)
20(60.6)
3.35(1.49, 7.51)
3.35(1.49, 7.51)
*Age in years
 
 
 
 
60-69
91(65.0)
36(39.6)
Ref
3.50(1.51, 8.12)
70+
49(35.0)
17(34.7)
0.81(0.39, 1.67)
Sex
 
 
 
 
Male
86(61.0)
26(30.2)
Ref
6.70(2.57, 17.43)
Female
55(39.0)
28(50.9)
2.39(1.19, 4.82)
Current Marital status
 
 
 
 
Married
82(58.2)
25(30.5)
Ref
2.77(1.18, 6.51)
Others
59(41.8)
29(49.2)
2.20(1.10, 4.41)
Death of spouse
 
 
 
 
Alive
89(63.1)
29(32.6)
Ref
2.96(1.28, 6.88)
Deceased
52(36.9)
25(48.1)
1.92(0.95, 3.86)
Educational level
 
 
 
 
At most can read and write
20(14.2)
12(60.0)
Ref
3.00(1.30, 6.93)
Grades 1-10
64(45.4)
29(45.3)
0.55(0.20, 1.53)
Above grade 10
57(40.4)
13(22.8)
0.20(0.07, 0.58)
Characteristics of elderly study participants
Number Interview
Mean (SD)
Crude OR (95%CI)
Partially adjusted OR (95%)*
Emotional support score
123
14.2(2.3)
0.74(0.62, 0.88)
2.11(0.76, 5.86)
Practical support score
122
6.9(1.7)
0.78(0.63, 0.98)
2.46(0.89, 6.76)
MMSE score 140 25.0(4.5) 0.89(0.82, 0.96) 2.44(1.03, 5.79)

*OR cross bonds to the effect of residence (CH versus community) after adjusting only for the corresponding background characteristic; SD = Standard deviation

Information of one respondent from CH is missing “age in years”.