Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 21;18(5):929–937. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12244

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analysis of association of TAP1 I333V gene polymorphism and T1DM

Genetic model Pooled OR (95% CI) P value Literature number T1DM size Control size Pheterogeneity (I2%)
Allelic genetic model 1.35 (1.08–1.68) 0.007* 13 1140 1106 0.04* (44.4)
Subgroup 1: before 1995 1.26 (0.90–1.75) 0.17 7 719 605 0.04* (53.7)
Subgroup 2: after 1996 1.39 (1.11–1.74) 0.004* 6 421 501 0.13 (40.8)
Recessive genetic model 1.384 (0.743–2.579) 0.306 13 1140 1106 0.202 (23.9)
Dominant genetic model 1.462 (1.094–1.955) 0.010* 13 1140 1106 0.007* (55.9)
Subgroup 1: IV1 < 30 1.289 (0.781–2.126) 0.320 7 431 384 0.034* (56.1)
Subgroup 2: IV1 > 30 1.620 (1.143–2.296) 0.007* 6 709 722 0.041* (56.9)
Homo genetic model 1.725 (1.082–2.752) 0.022* 13 1140 1106 0.324 (12.0)
Hetero genetic model 1.430 (1.048–1.951) 0.024* 13 1140 1106 0.004* (58.4)
Subgroup 1:II1 < 40 2.183 (1.148–4.151) 0.017* 6 254 283 0.037* (57.8)
Subgroup 2: II1 ≥ 40 1.191 (0.963–1.472) 0.106 7 886 823 0.190 (31.2)
Additive genetic model 1.348 (1.084–1.676) 0.007* 13 1140 1106 0.043 (44.4)
Subgroup 1:II1 < 40 1.867 (1.361–2.561) <0.001* 6 254 283 0.262 (22.8)
Subgroup 2: II1 ≥ 40 1.218 (1.023–1.450) 0.027* 7 886 823 0.147 (36.8)
*

P < 0.05. T1DM: type 1 diabetes mellitus; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; T1DM size: the total number of T1DM cases; control size: the total number of control group; homo genetic model: homozygous genetic model; hetero genetic model: heterozygous genetic model.