Table 4. Comparison of hypothetical strategy of non-tailored access and navigation for both FIT and CX versus TNI strategy of tailored access and navigation for preferred test(s) only (N = 933^*).

	Overall screening			FIT screening vs. none			CX screening vs. none
	OR	(95% CI)	p	OR	(95% CI)	p	OR	(95% CI)	p
Among those with:
FIT preference	1.12	(0.47, 2.66)	0.799	0.95	(0.36, 2.51)	0.918	5.39	(0.57, 51.2)	0.143
Equal FIT/CX preference	1.00	N/A		1.00	N/A		1.00	N/A
CX preference	2.70	(1.36, 5.37)	0.005	5.62	(1.81, 17.4)	0.001	1.78	(0.75, 4.20)	0.190

^*Final multivariable results based on 933 participants with full covariate data. The model included terms for preference, access, and navigation (from which the above tailoring effects were estimated), and controlled for primary care practice, age, sex, race, education, marital status, perceptions of CRC and screening, and baseline screening decision stage.

FIT: fecal immunochemical test. CX: colonoscopy.

N/A: not applicable (interventions are identical by design for this preference group).