Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;13:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-13-18

Table 2.

Descriptive nutritional risk screening data according to the Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form (MEONF-II)

  "First" nurse assessments, day 1 a) "Second" nurse assessments, day 1 a) Nurse assessments, day 2 a)
Unintentional weight loss, n (%)
4 (17)
4 (17)
5 (21)
Low Body Mass Index or short Calf Circumference, n (%)
1 (4)
2 (8)
1 (4)
Problem with…
 
 
 
…food intake, n (%)b)
6 (25)
7 (29)
6 (25)
…swallowing/mouth, n (%)c)
4 (17)
2 (8)
8 (33)
…energy/appetite, n (%)d)
6 (25)
4 (17)
6 (25)
Clinical signs indicate risk of undernutrition, n (%)
5 (21)
4 (17)
4 (17)
MEONF-II total scoree)
 
 
 
Mean (SD)
1.5 (1.8)
1.2 (1.5)
1.6 (1.8)
Median (q1-q3)
1.0 (0–3)
0.5 (0–2)
1.5 (0–2)
Minimum-Maximum
0–6
0–5
0–6
MEONF-II risk category
 
 
 
No/Low risk, n (%)
18 (75)
19 (79)
19 (79)
Moderate risk, n (%)
5 (21)
4 (17)
2 (8)
High risk, n (%) 1 (4) 1 (4) 3 (13)

a)The "first" (n = 4) and "second" nurses (n = 4) conducted parallel but independent assessments of patients on day 1 and repeated their assessments on day 2 (the same nurses for the same patients as on day 1).

b)Sitting position; Manipulating food on the plate; Conveying food to the mouth.

c)Chewing; Coping with food in the mouth; Swallowing.

d)Eats less than ¾ of served food; Lacks energy to complete an entire meal; Poor appetite.

e)Possible score range, 0–8 (8 = worst).