Table 2.
Correlations Among Key Variables in the Analysis
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Family support | ||||||||||||
| 2. Partner violence | −.192 ** | |||||||||||
| 3. Child maltreatment | −.149 ** | .283 ** | ||||||||||
| 4. Wave 1 internalizing | −.179 ** | .085 ** | .310 ** | |||||||||
| 5. Wave 1 externalizing | −.255 ** | .252 ** | .484 ** | .631 ** | ||||||||
| 6. Wave 2 internalizing | −.173 ** | .116 ** | .265 ** | .585 ** | .477 ** | |||||||
| 7. Wave 2 externalizing | −.200 ** | .258 ** | .348 ** | .392 ** | .654 ** | .633 ** | ||||||
| 8. ETV (severe) boys | −.106 ** | .090 * | .066 | .043 | .114 ** | .100 * | .157 ** | |||||
| 9. ETV (severe) girls | −.162 ** | .052 | .010 | .020 | .132 ** | .108 ** | .169 ** | − | ||||
| 10. Neigh concentrated disadv | −.148 ** | .073 * | .048 | −.006 | .115 ** | .014 | .123 ** | .172 ** | .174 ** | |||
| 11. Neigh residential stability | .038 | .045 | −.028 | −.061 * | −.061 * | −.100 ** | −.055 | −.077 | −.082 * | −.075 | ||
| 12. Neigh immigrant conc | .003 | −.213 ** | −.018 | .132 ** | −.019 | .123 ** | −.076 ** | −.041 | −.029 | −.080 | −.127 | |
| 13. Neigh co lective efficacy | .083 ** | .061 ** | −.014 | −.086 ** | −.068 * | −.095 **] | −.045 | −.114 ** | −.126 ** | −.356 ** | .278 ** | −.239 ** |
Note: Correlations for ETV (severe) are based on gender-specific samples (males: N=629; females: N=598). Correlations among all other level one variables based on the full individual level sample (N=1227). Correlations among neighborhood level variables based on the tract-level sample (N=169)