Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2009 Oct;27(10):1366–1372. doi: 10.1002/jor.20885

Table 2.

Summary of Prior AIS Linkage Studies

Reference N (families/subjects)* Location Methods Comments
18 52/123 (affected) 1p, 8q, 10q “Affecteds only” nonparametric linkage, TDT CHD7 identified as candidate gene on chromosome 8
16 202/1198 1,6,8,9,16 and17 Genomic screen and model independent analysis As threshold for scoliosis curvature increased, chromosomes 9 and 16 became more significant
17 202/1198 5p13, 13q13.3, 13q32 Nonparametric sib pair, linkage disequilibrium Kyphoscoliotic subgroup analysis
11 1/14 6q distal 10q 18q Two point parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage Genome wide search in one family (7 affected members), followed by testing of “hot spots” in a second large family
13 1/17 17p11 Parametric linkage Overlaps duplication in CMT type 1A
12 7/52 19p13.3 Parametric and nonparametric linkage Recruited patients in whom scoliosis developed in adolescence
15 202/1198 19p13 Nonparametric sib pair, parametric linkage Subgroup analysis limited to kindreds in which at least 1 member had curve ≥30°
14 202/1198 Xq23, Xq26.1 Nonparametric sib pair, parametric linkage Estimate that 15% of AIS families display X-linkage
41 25/116(affected) 9q31.2-q34.2; 17q25.3-qtel Two point parametric and nonparametric multipoint Confirmation of ref. 15
*

NR = not reported.