Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 1;72(7):595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.028

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Different left DLPFC TMS targets show variability in resting state functional connectivity, especially with the subgenual cingulate. The left hand column shows the coordinates and regions of interest for various left DLPFC TMS targets employed in the literature. The middle columns show resting state functional connectivity maps for each DLPFC region of interest. The border of our a-priori defined subgenual region of interest is show for reference in red. The right hand column is the correlation coefficient between the timecourse from each DLPFC region of interest and that of the subgenual cingulate.