Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2014 May 17;27(8):897–906. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3133

Table 1.

Homogeneity analysis of an example rat brain (Figs. 1/3) after magnetic field shimming. Major field imperfections remain after static third order SH shimming (Fig. 1) which is reflected by a large residual standard deviation (SD) and broad frequency ranges to cover 80%, 85%, 90% and 95% of the brain voxels (all values in Hertz). In comparison, DYNAMITE shimming removes most magnetic field imperfections in the rat brain (Fig. 3) and allows a substantial narrowing of the frequency distribution.

shim method SD 80% 85% 90% 95%
static third order SH 58 116 136 171 231
DYNAMITE 22 35 45 60 91