Table 3.
Characterization of the associations between ATC and MeSH classes based on scores for equivalence and inclusion
ATC to MeSH |
Best equivalence |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
>.5 | <.5 | Total | ||
Best inclusion |
>.5 |
148 (17%) |
580 (70%) |
728 (87%) |
<.5 |
1 (1%) |
99 (12%) |
100 (13%) |
|
Total |
149 (18%) |
679 (82%) |
828 (100%) |
|
MeSH to ATC |
Best equivalence |
|||
>.5 |
<.5 |
Total |
||
Best inclusion |
>.5 |
120 (9%) |
390 (30%) |
510 (39%) |
<.5 |
45 (3%) |
762 (58%) |
807 (61%) |
|
Total | 165 (12%) | 1,152 (88%) | 1,317 (100%) |