Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 9;2014:367675. doi: 10.1155/2014/367675

Table 3.

Perioperative outcomes in clinical series consisting of patients who underwent RARP after prostate surgery.

Series Study population Mean follow-up, mos Mean EBL, mL Mean OR time, min Mean days on catheter, d Mean hospital stay, d Nerve sparing, n
Zugor et al. [38] 80 pts with TURP before RARP versus 80 pts with RARP 13.5 165 versus 144 189 versus 149 6.8 versus 5.2 NA 42 versus 54
Martin et al.
[36]
24 pts with previous treatment to the prostate and RARP versus 486 with no previous treatment and RARP NA 155 versus 137 200 versus 186 12 versus 8 (P = 0.028) 2.2 versus 1.5 14 versus 403
Gupta et al.
[37]
18 pts with TURP before RARP versus 8 pts with pT1b CaP and RARP versus 132 pts with RARP 15.3 4941 versus 358.3 versus 324.2 (P = 0.03) 189.1 versus 162.5 versus 166 15.5 versus 14.2 versus 13.3 4.4 versus 4.1 versus 3.2 NA
Martin- schek et al.
[39]
19 pts with previous TURP and RARP versus 19 pts with previous TURP and RRP NA 333 versus 1103 (P < 0.001) 217 versus 174 (P = 0.02) 7.9 versus 11.7 (P = 0.001) 8.5 versus 11.7 (P = 0.003) 14 versus 13

TURP: transurethral resection of the prostate; RARP: robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; CaP: prostate cancer; EBL: estimated blood loss; OR: operating; and NA: not available.