Table 3. Patient clinical and immunophenotypical characteristics of patients with DLBCL, NOS in relation to DHS and THS.
MYC/BCL2 | MYC/BCL6 | BCL2/BCL6 | MYC/BCL2/BCL6 | |||||||||||||||
Characteristic | All patients(n = 336) | DHS 0(n = 90) | DHS 1(n = 151) | DHS 2(n = 95) | P | DHS 0(n = 57) | DHS 1(n = 173) | DHS 2(n = 106) | P | DHS 0(n = 65) | DHS 1(n = 156) | DHS 2(n = 115) | P | THS 0(n = 27) | THS 1(n = 131) | THS 2(n = 109) | THS 3(n = 69) | P |
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||||
LDH>ULN | 129 (38) | 28 (31) | 52 (34) | 49 (52) | 0.007 | 17 (30) | 61 (35) | 51 (48) | 0.035 | 23 (35) | 57 (37) | 49 (43) | 0.512 | 7 (26) | 47 (36) | 38 (35) | 37 (54) | 0.024 |
ECOG PS ≥2 | 51 (15) | 8 (9) | 20 (13) | 23 (24) | 0.010 | 6 (11) | 24 (14) | 21 (20) | 0.228 | 4 (6) | 26 (17) | 21 (18) | 0.073 | 2 (7) | 12 (9) | 23 (21) | 14 (20) | 0.025 |
Stage III/IV | 156 (46) | 36 (40) | 73 (48) | 47 (49) | 0.355 | 19 (33) | 80 (46) | 57 (54) | 0.044 | 28 (43) | 67 (43) | 61 (53) | 0.215 | 12 (44) | 47 (36) | 63 (58) | 34 (49) | 0.008 |
Extranodal sites ≥2 | 57(17) | 13 (14) | 30 (20) | 14 (15) | 0.440 | 8 (14) | 31 (18) | 18 (17) | 0.795 | 11 (17) | 23 (15) | 23 (20) | 0.522 | 4 (15) | 20 (15) | 22 (20) | 11 (16) | 0.751 |
IPI score of 3–5 | 83 (25) | 14 (16) | 39 (26) | 30 (32) | 0.038 | 7 (12) | 43 (25) | 33 (31) | 0.029 | 11 (17) | 36 (23) | 36 (31) | 0.081 | 3 (11) | 23 (18) | 36 (33) | 21 (30) | 0.009 |
Immunohistochemical subgroups | ||||||||||||||||||
CD5-positive | 15 (4) | 2 (2) | 7 (5) | 6 (6) | NS* | 3 (5) | 3 (2) | 9 (8) | NS* | 0 (0) | 8 (5) | 7 (6) | NS* | 0 (0) | 5 (4) | 4 (4) | 6 (9) | NS* |
GCB | 90 (27) | 29 (32) | 48 (32) | 13 (14) | 0.004 # | 21 (37) | 50 (29) | 19 (18) | 0.034 # | 33 (51) | 38 (24) | 19 (17) | <0.001 # | 12 (44) | 47 (36) | 21 (19) | 10 (14) | 0.001 # |
non-GCB | 231 (69) | 59 (66) | 96 (63) | 76 (80) | 33 (58) | 120 (69) | 78 (74) | 32 (49) | 110 (71) | 89 (77) | 15 (56) | 79 (60) | 84 (77) | 53 (77) |
P values were derived using Pearson’s Chi-Square test. Bold font indicates significance.
*NS, not suitable for chi-square test among CD5+ vs. GCB vs. non-GCB, because more than 1/5 of the expected values were less than five.
P value GCB vs. non-GCB.