. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014 Sep;23(5):385–390. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000027

Table 3.

Pearsons correlations (and P values) for urinary analytes and self-reported dietary data among controls only

	Urinary 1- methylhistidine	Urinary 3- methylhistidine		Red meat		White meat		Processed meat
	Urinary 1- methylhistidine	r (95% CI)	P value	r (95% CI)	P value	r (95% CI)	P value	r (95% CI)	P value
Urinary 1-methylhistidine	1	0.60 (0.47–0.70)	<0.0001	0.21 (0.03–0.37)	0.019	0.18 (0.01–0.34)	0.038	0.21 (0.03–0.37)	0.018
Urinary 3-methylhistidine		1		−0.06 (−0.22–0.12)	0.54	0.25 (0.08–0.41)	0.004	0.009 (−0.17–0.18)	0.921
Red meat				1		0.04 (−0.13–0.21)	0.646	0.77 (0.69–0.83)	<0.0001
White meat						1		0.11 (−0.06–0.28)	0.208
Processed meat								1