Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2014 May 23;307(3):H437–H447. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2014

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 4. — Percentage of missed detections (means ± SD) for each intracardiac lead at tidal volumes of 500 ml (in white) and 750 ml (in black), averaged across all animals, for unipolar leads (A), far-field bipolar leads (B), near-field bipolar leads (C), and RV-CS leads (D). No statistically significant difference was found between tidal volume 500 and 750 ml for any intracardiac lead, and no statistically significant difference was found between any 2 unipolar, any 2 far-field bipolar, any 2 near-field bipolar, or any 2 RV-CS leads, respectively. A: unipolar missed detection percent ranges from 0.0 to 9.2% with mean of 1.7%. B: far-field bipolar missed detection percent also ranges from 0.0 to 9.2% with mean of 1.7%. C: near-field bipolar missed detection percent ranges from 0.0 to 12.9% with mean of 5.7%. D: RV-CS bipolar missed detection percent ranges from 0.0 to 6.3% with a mean of 2.8%. As shown, the average percentage of missed detections in all intracardiac lead configurations is low.