Skip to main content
. 2014 May 23;307(3):H437–H447. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2014

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Estimated vs. true respiration rate using the optimized algorithm, compiled across all animals and tidal volumes, for RV (A), CS (B), LV (C), and EPI (D) lead groupings. Nonrounded estimates (●) and downrounded rounded estimates (■) are displayed as means ± SD. A dashed line marks equality (y = x). The downrounded respiration estimates closely track the true RR, with goodness-of-fit R2 statistic of 0.97, 0.96, 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for RV, CS, LV, EPI, and RV-CS estimates, respectively (RV-CS data not shown).