Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 6;307(3):H426–H436. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2014

Table 1.

Goodness of fit to a line for the percent modulation as a function of tidal volume, for body surface and intracardiac CS, LV, RV, and RV-CS leads, across all animals

Lead R2 (nonoptimized) R2 (optimized) a b
SURF 0.45 ± 0.19 0.77 ± 0.11 16.61 0.51
CS 0.44 ± 0.22 0.69 ± 0.18 15.42 −122.29
LV 0.47 ± 0.24 0.76 ± 0.20 17.50 −41.37
RV 0.63 ± 0.22 0.76 ± 0.20 9.50 −42.16
RV-CS 0.84 ± 0.14 0.91 ± 0.14 25.35 −57.09

The coefficient of determination (medians ± SE) is reported for both nonoptimized and optimized percent modulation at tidal volumes (TVs) of 0, 250, 500, and 750 ml; n = 10. The regression coefficients derived from a least squares regression analysis (TV = a × percent modulation + b) between the TV and percent modulation are also presented.

SURF, body surface; CS, coronary sinus; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.