Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Educ Prev. 2014 Aug;26(4):328–344. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2014.26.4.328

Table 1.

Bivariate Correlations

Ever Tested Recency of Testing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Demographics
  1. Age .31**** −.19****
  2. Education .18**** .06 .07*
  3. Income .24**** −.04 .42**** .21****
Health Insurance
  4. Contributory .23**** .08 .15**** .34**** .28****
  5. Subsidized −.18**** −.08 −.03 −.18**** −.20**** −.45****
  6. Linked −.02 .03 −.02 −.02 .02 −.23**** −.24****
  7. None or don’t know −.04 −.04 −.11** −.14**** −.09** −.39**** −.42**** −.21****
Risk appraisal
  8. Ever had STI .28**** .00 .19**** .11*** .10** .09** −.08* .01 −.01
  9. Know PLWH .15**** −.06 .27**** −.03 .13*** .01 .05 .00 −.06 .13****
Social context
  10. Social support .12*** −.01 −.14**** .32**** .11** .12*** −.19**** −.01 .09** .03 −.13****
  11. Experienced homonegativity .09** −.00 −.01 .03 −.01 .02 −.08* −.06 .12*** .16**** .05 .17****
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001;

****

p < .0001

Note: N = 890 except for correlations involving recency of testing, which include only those participants who had been tested and could specify the year (N = 443).

Note: Entries represent Spearman correlations for pairs of ordinal variables, Phi coefficients for pairs of dichotomous variables, and rank bi-serial correlations for pairs containing an ordinal and a dichotomous variable.