Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep 7;22(1):135–143. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1962-9

Table 3.

Adherence to lymphedema management modalitiesa

Modality Adherence Baseline 3-months 6-months 12-months Odds Ratio (95% CI)b P-Value
Exercise
<25% 42 (52%) 22 (31%) 20 (29%) 29 (43%) 0.97 (0.90–1.05) 0.447
25–49% 20 (25%) 14 (19%) 21 (30%) 15 (22%) 0.99 (0.90–1.08) 0.765
50–74% 8 (10%) 16 (22%) 10 (14%) 10 (15%) 1.00 (0.89–1.12) 0.988
≥75% 11 (14%) 20 (28%) 19 (27%) 14 (21%) 1 – Referent
Pneumatic Compression Pump
<25% 5 (31%) 6 (50%) 6 (43%) 3 (43%) Insufficient Observationsc
25–49% 2 (13%) 2 (17%) 2 (14%) 1 (14%)
50–74% 2 (13%) 1 (8%) 3 (21%) 1 (14%)
≥75% 7 (44%) 3 (25%) 3 (21%) 2 (30%)
Medications
<25% 3 (43%) 3 (43%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) Insufficient Observationsc
25–49% 2 (29%) 0 (0%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%)
50–74% 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
≥75% 2 (29%) 3 (43%) 1 (33%) 2 (100%)
Bandaging
<25% 31 (33%) 31 (42%) 29 (37%) 27 (39%) 1.04 (0.94–1.15) 0.444
25–49% 13 (14%) 7 (9%) 10 (13%) 13 (19%) 1.10 (0.94–1.28) 0.233
50–74% 13 (14%) 8 (11%) 15 (19%) 8 (12%) 0.96 (0.85–1.10) 0.587
≥75% 37 (39%) 28 (38%) 24 (31%) 21 (30%) 1 – Referent
Elevation
<25% 16 (27%) 16 (42%) 14 (29%) 15 (31%) 1.08 (0.97–1.20) 0.146
25–49% 9 (15%) 5 (13%) 12 (24%) 11 (24%) 0.99 (0.90–1.11) 0.948
50–74% 16 (27%) 8 (21%) 15 (31%) 7 (14%) 0.92 (0.79–1.07) 0.292
≥75% 18 (31%) 9 (24%) 8 (16%) 15 (31%) 1 – Referent
Self-Administered Lymphatic Drainage
<25% 20 (37%) 22 (42%) 18 (37%) 27 (54%) 1.15 (1.05–1.26) 0.002
25–49% 13 (24%) 14 (26%) 12 (24%) 10 (20%) 0.91 (0.75–1.10) 0.310
50–74% 9 (17%) 10 (19%) 7 (14%) 5 (10%) 1.02 (0.89–1.16) 0.790
≥75% 12 (22%) 7 (13%) 12 (24%) 8 (16%) 1 – Referent
Therapist-Administered Lymphatic Drainage
<25% 11 (17%) 16 (40%) 17 (49%) 15 (45%) 0.99 (0.94–1.05) 0.874
25–49% 14 (22%) 4 (10%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 0.98 (0.93–1.04) 0.605
50–74% 12 (19%) 3 (8%) 3 (9%) 5 (15%) 1.04 (0.98–1.10) 0.231
≥75% 27 (42%) 17 (42%) 13 (37%) 10 (30%) 1 – Referent
Compression Garment
<25% 27 (25%) 26 (22%) 19 (17%) 25 (24%) 0.99 (0.94–1.05) 0.874
25–49% 21 (19%) 20 (17%) 20 (18%) 15 (14%) 0.98 (0.93–1.04) 0.605
50–74% 17 (15%) 22 (19%) 28 (25%) 24 (23%) 1.03 (0.98–1.10) 0.231
≥75% 45 (41%) 48 (41%) 43 (39%) 41 (39%) 1 – Referent
Skin Care
<25% 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1.02 (0.77–1.33) 0.932
25–49% 6 (13%) 2 (4%) 2 (4%) 5 (11%) 1.01 (0.88–1.16) 0.892
50–74% 7 (15%) 9 (18%) 10 (21%) 7 (15%) 1.00 (0.92–1.09) 0.939
≥75% 32 (70%) 37 (76%) 34 (72%) 34 (72%) 1 – Referent
Taping
<25% 3 (27%) 1 (25%) 4 (33%) 4 (36%) Insufficient Observationsc
25–49% 2 (18%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 2 (18%)
50–74% 1 (9%) 1 (25%) 6 (50%) 1 (9%)
≥75% 5 (45%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%)
Anything Else
<25% 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) Insufficient Observationsc
25–49% 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
50–74% 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
≥75% 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

All Lymphedema Management Modalities (Overall Average)d
<25% 16 (13%) 19 (15%) 13 (11%) 15 (14%) 0.99 (0.92–1.07) 0.886
25–49% 26 (28%) 26 (21%) 28 (23%) 28 (26%) 1.00 (0.95–1.06) 0.812
50–74% 39 (31%) 37 (30%) 43 (36%) 33 (31%) 1.01 (0.95–1.06) 0.799
≥75% 37 (29%) 41 (33%) 37 (31%) 32 (30%) 1 – Referent
a

Variables are n (%).

b

Multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, occupation, education, time since diagnosis, cancer stage, no. of nodes removed, radiation, chemotherapy, baseline arm volume difference, randomized group assignment, and diagnosis of lymphedema flare-up while in the study, and accounting for within subject clustering. Other variables listed in Table 1 were omitted on the basis of multicollinearity.

c

Due to small cell sizes of these modalities, a statistical model could not be calculated.

d

Excluding the women who reported being prescribed no self-care activities in this time interval.