Table 1. Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- isolates used in this study.
PCR resultsa | ||||||||||||||
Isolates | Source | Year | m-PCR | IS200 | up-fljA | fljA-fljB | fljB-hin | hin-down | fin | spvB | 94 kb plasmidb | Phage typec | LDCd | Resistance profilee |
H1∼4 | Human | 2006 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | 193 | + | - |
H5 | Human | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 193 | + | ASSu |
H6 | Human | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
H7 | Human | 2003 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | 193 | + | - |
H8 | Human | 2007 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | 26 | + | - |
H9∼11 | Human | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
H12 | Human | 2004 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | RDNC-c | + | - |
H13 | Human | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 193 | + | SSuT |
H14 | Human | 2002 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | UT | + | ASuT |
C1 | Cattle | 2003 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | - | - |
C2 | Cattle | 2005 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | - | - |
C3∼4 | Cattle | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | - | - |
C5∼8 | Cattle | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | - | - |
C9∼10 | Cattle | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | A |
C11 | Cattle | 2004 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
C12 | Cattle | 2005 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | 120 | + | - |
C13 | Cattle | 2005 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | RDNC-b | + | - |
C14 | Cattle | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | UT | + | ASSuT |
C15 | Cattle | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC | + | - |
C16 | Cattle | 2010 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
C17 | Cattle | 2010 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-b | + | A |
S1 | Swine | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | UT | + | ASSuT |
S2 | Swine | 2009 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | UT | + | ASSu |
S3 | Swine | 2002 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | RDNC-d | + | Ssu |
S4 | Swine | 2003 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | RDNC-d | + | SSuT |
S5 | Swine | 2008 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 193 | + | SSuT |
S6 | Swine | 2009 | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | 27 | + | ASSuT |
K1 | Chicken | 2001 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-b | + | - |
K2 | Chicken | 2004 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | RDNC | + | - |
K3 | Chicken | 2005 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | RDNC-c | + | - |
K4 | Chicken | 2006 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | RDNC-c | + | - |
K5 | Chicken | 2010 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC | + | ASuT |
B1 | Penguin | 2009 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | RDNC | + | - |
B2∼3 | Crow | 2000 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | RDNC-e | + | - |
B4 | Parrot | 2005 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | RDNC-e | + | - |
M1 | Pork | 2005 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
M2 | Pork | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | - |
R1 | River water | 2007 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | 26 | + | - |
R2 | River water | 2007 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | RDNC-a | + | ASu |
R3 | River water | 2007 | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | 26 | + | - |
m-PCR, multiplex PCR to identify S. Typhimurium [25]; IS200, PCR to identify S. Typhimurium [15]; up-fljA, boundary region of fljA and its upstream intergenic region; fljA–fljB, boundary region of fljA and fljB; fljB–hin, boundary region of fljB and hin; hin-down, boundary region of hin and its downstream intergenic region; +, positive; -,negative.
+, presence; -, absence.
RDNC, reacted but did not conform; RDNC-a–e, same letter indicates the same lysogenic patterns among RDNC isolates.
LDC, lysine decarboxylase; +, positive; -, negative.
A, ampicillin; S, streptomycin; Su, sulfamethizole; T, tetracycline; -, pansusceptible.