Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):912–922. doi: 10.1037/a0020704

Table 4.

Sensitivity Analysis for Latent Construct Mean Differences Under Full Versus Partial Strong Factorial Invariance

Factorial invariance and factor Estimated latent factor mean for Black women SE 99% CI Standardized effect size
Full strong factorial invariance (Model 3a)
 Somatization 0.16*** 0.02 [0.12, 0.21] 0.45
 Depression 0.16*** 0.04 [0.07, 0.25] 0.27
 Anxiety 0.14*** 0.03 [0.06, 0.21] 0.24
Partial strong factorial invariance (Model 3b)
 Somatization 0.16*** 0.02 [0.12, 0.21] 0.45
 Depression 0.16*** 0.04 [0.07, 0.25] 0.27
 Anxiety 0.23*** 0.04 [0.14, 0.32] 0.39

Note. The reference group was White women. The method for computing the standardized effect size was similar to that used in Hancock (2001), using the formula shown in M. S. Thompson and Green (2006) with a pooled estimate of the standard deviation because the factor variances were not constrained to be equal across groups. CI = confidence interval.

***

p < .001.