Table 3.

Channels with significantly higher ERS/ERD by Window, Task, and Modality as determined in post hoc tests of ANOVA described in text

	Modality
Task	Laser	Electric
Window I-delta/theta
Count laser	Cz*
Count electric		F3*†, F4*†, C3*†, C4*†, Cz*†, Pz*†
Window II-delta/theta
Count laser	F4*, Cz*
Count electric
Window III-alpha
Count laser	C3*
Count electric
Window V-gamma
Count laser
Count electric	C3†

^*Indicates greater ERS/ERD activity for the task with the * vs. the other task, while both tasks are under the same modality. For example, in window I-delta/theta under the laser modality and attention task the * by Cz indicates that the Cz has greater ERS for the attention than the distraction task, while the laser modality remains the same.

^†Indicates greater ERS/ERD for the modality with the † vs. the other modality, while the task remains the same. For example, under the laser modality and count electric task the † beside the C3 in window V-gamma indicates that the C3 has greater ERS for the laser than electric modality, while the count electric task remains the same.

^*†Indicates greater ERS/ERD for the modality and task of the channel with the *† vs. both the other modality and task, i.e., interaction term. For example, in window I-delta/theta and channel F3 the electric stimulus and the count electric task had larger ERS than the laser stimulus and the attention task.