Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 7;10(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S5

Table 1.

Identification sites and repeatability of identification (%) of abdominal structures, imaged using a detailed transcutaneous ultrasonographic technique in five normal horses, repeated on five occasions (total of 25 examinations).

Repeatability of identification (%) at each individual imaging site*
Abdominal structure Right caudo-dorsal flank Right caudo-ventral flank Right cranio-dorsal flank Right cranio- ventral flank Left caudo-dorsal flank Left caudo-ventral flank Left cranio-dorsal flank Left cranio- ventral flank Cranio-ventral abdomen Caudo-ventral abdomen Repeatability of identification across complete examination (examinations identified / total number of examinations)**

Duodenum 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72% (18/25)

Other small intestine 0 40 32 28 12 8 36 40 36 32 76% (19/25)

Caecum 100 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% (25/25)

Sacculated large intestine 56 95 12 100 100 100 84 100 100 100 100% (25/25)

Non-sacculated large intestine 32 4 88 0 12 0 44 0 0 0 92% (23/25)

Right kidney 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% (25/25)

Left kidney 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 88% (22/25)

Liver 0 0 100 80 0 0 0 16 0 0 100% (25/25)

Spleen 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 32 56 100% (25/25)

*The repeatability of identification (%) at each individual imaging site describes how often each abdominal structure was identified at each separate imaging site (across all 25 examinations (five horses examined five times)), i.e. where can you find this structure on ultrasonographic examination?

** The repeatability of identification across complete examination describes how often each abdominal structure was identified at any site during each examination (total of 25 examinations (five horses examined five times)), i.e. how often can you find this structure on ultrasonographic examination of the whole abdomen?

The site where each structure was most repeatedly identified, termed the best imaging site is highlighted in bold.