Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Aug 6;8(4):e374–e381. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.06.002

Table 2.

Tumor Characteristics & Cancer Treatment

Case (N, %) Control (N, %)
Gleason score
<7 19 (6%) 123 (29%)
7 157 (49%) 188 (44%)
8+ 126 (39%) 41 (10%)
Missing 21 (6%) 76 (17%)
P<0.0001
Tumor grade
1 4 (1%) 7 (2%)
2 37 (11%) 153 (36%)
3 282 (88%) 262 (61%)
Missing 0 (0%) 6 (1%)
P<0.0001
Positive Margins
Yes 146 (45%) 154 (36%)
No 149 (46%) 197 (46%)
Missing 28 (9%) 77 (18%)
P<0.0001
Lymph nodes
Yes 44 (14%) 29 (7%)
No 211 (65%) 272 (64%)
Missing 68 (21%) 127 (29%)
P<0.0001
PSA at diagnosis
0–6 59 (18%) 86 (20%)
7–10 50 (15%) 101 (24%)
11–18 57 (18%) 93 (22%)
19+ 77 (24%) 70 (16%)
Missing 80 (25%) 78 (18%)
P=0.002
Curative txt >6 months after diagnosis
Yes 222 (69%) 285 (67%)
No 101 (31%) 143 (33%)
P=0.73
Radiation txt for curative intent plus prostatectomy
Yes 99 (31%) 65 (15%)
No 224 (69%) 363 (85%)
P<0.0001
Neoadjuvant hormone treatment
Yes 18 (6%) 19 (4%)
No 305 (94%) 409 (96%)
P=0.48