Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 18;122(8):823–830. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307287

Table 3.

Model performance (cross-validated R2 and RMSE) for PM10–2.5 mass (μg/m3) and species concentrations (ng/m3)a using land use regression (LUR) and universal kriging (UK) models.

Model CV measure Total mass Copper Phosphorus Silicon Zinc
aSilicon values in μg/m3. bThe predictors included in each model are listed in Supplemental Material, Tables S2–S6. bFor pooled models across all cities, we present the R2 for the explanatory power of each city as calculated by the formula (1 – sum of squared differences between observations and predictions/sum of squared differences between observations and city-specific means). R2 with values < 0 are reported as 0. RMSE was calculated as the square root of the average of squared differences between observations and predictions. The respective R2 and RMSE values for each city appear in the following order: Chicago, St. Paul, Winston-Salem.
Land use regressionb
Chicago, IL R2 0.68 0.65 0.50 0.68 0.73
Chicago, IL RMSE 1.16 2.29 3.88 0.08 10.63
St Paul, MN R2 0.51 0.86 0.68 0.93 0.40
St Paul, MN RMSE 2.33 0.61 4.14 0.07 4.44
Winston Salem, NC R2 0.41 0.51 0.76 0.48 0.36
Winston Salem, NC RMSE 1.09 0.93 3.95 0.07 1.89
All citiesb R2 0.52, 0.54, 0.10 0.65, 0.49, 0.09 0.34, 0.59, 0.66 0.24, 0.64, 0 0.61, 0, 0
All citiesb RMSE 1.39, 2.24, 1.33 2.26, 1.06, 1.25 4.39, 4.63, 4.66 0.13, 0.16, 0.12 12.72, 6.10, 3.58
Universal kriging
Chicago, IL R2 0.68 0.64 0.50 0.68 0.73
Chicago, IL RMSE 1.14 2.32 3.88 0.08 10.60
St Paul, MN R2 0.51 0.86 0.68 0.91 0.38
St Paul, MN RMSE 2.32 0.61 4.14 0.08 4.52
Winston Salem, NC R2 0.41 0.51 0.76 0.47 0.36
Winston Salem, NC RMSE 1.09 0.93 3.95 0.07 1.89
All cities R2 0.51, 0.52, 0.11 0.20, 0.20, 0 0.15, 0.38, 0.65 0.22, 0.64, 0 0, 0, 0
All cities RMSE 1.42, 2.29, 1.33 3.42, 1.34, 2.10 5.00, 5.67, 4.78 0.13, 0.16, 0.13 22.01, 7.66, 10.58