Table 4.
Changes in cold ischemic time and type of allocation (local, state, regional, national) before and after Statewide Sharing
| State | Local | State | Regionala | National | CIT: Change from “Before” to “Recently after” (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allocation (%) | Mean CIT (h) | Allocation (%) | Mean CIT (h) | Allocation (%) | Mean CIT (h) | Allocation (%) | Mean CIT (h) | ||
| TN | |||||||||
| Before | 59.1 | 18.5 | 2.2 | 28.5 | 12.8 | 25.9 | 25.9 | 29.4 | 7.5 |
| Recently after | 56.7 | 16.1 | 13.1 | 18.6 | 8.3 | 26.6 | 21.8 | 24.8 | |
| NC | |||||||||
| Before | 57.6 | 20.4 | 1.8 | 23.3 | 16.4 | 24.8 | 24.2 | 31.6 | −0.7 |
| Recently after | 69.7 | 20.8 | 3.1 | 24.4 | 4.8 | 21.5 | 22.4 | 24.5 | |
| PA | |||||||||
| Before | 85.5 | 25.4 | 2.2 | 33.4 | 2.9 | 30.1 | 9.3 | 31.5 | −3.3 |
| Recently after | 79.2 | 16.4 | 1.6 | 27.6 | 4.4 | 24.8 | 14.7 | 25.1 | |
| WI | |||||||||
| Before | 86.9 | 26.0 | 1.5 | 30.3 | 0.7 | 35.1 | 10.9 | 33.2 | 1.1 |
| Recently after | 82.9 | 14.5 | 0.8 | 17.5 | 3.9 | 21.7 | 12.5 | 24.8 | |
| FL | |||||||||
| Before | 52.9 | 22.7 | 6.7 | 30.4 | 16.4 | 33.3 | 24.1 | 35.6 | 5.0 |
| Recently after | 70.6 | 20.3 | 6.8 | 23.0 | 2.7 | 23.8 | 19.9 | 25.3 | |
| CA | |||||||||
| Before | 76.1 | 27.1 | 6.1 | 29.1 | 12.0 | 21.0 | 5.8 | 32.4 | −3.9 |
| Recently after | 73.7 | 14.3 | 5.5 | 20.2 | 3.1 | 17.5 | 17.6 | 26.3 | |
| NY | |||||||||
| Before | 86.8 | 25.5 | 3.1 | 32.6 | 0.7 | 23.8 | 9.4 | 32.2 | −0.8 |
| Recently after | 77.1 | 16.9 | 4.4 | 24.7 | 0.0 | – | 18.5 | 24.1 | |
| OH | |||||||||
| Before | 84.0 | 22.4 | 2.2 | 27.0 | 3.4 | 27.4 | 10.4 | 29.8 | −2.7 |
| Recently after | 70.3 | 13.6 | 3.1 | 20.8 | 3.3 | 21.4 | 23.3 | 24.1 | |
| TX | |||||||||
| Before | 88.0 | 20.7 | 4.0 | 26.5 | 0.5 | 26.1 | 7.4 | 29.6 | 1.7 |
| Recently after | 74.4 | 18.0 | 4.6 | 22.2 | 0.7 | 16.4 | 20.4 | 24.8 | |
Florida and Tennessee implemented Statewide Sharing in 1991 and 1992, respectively. To clarify the distribution of kidneys used, the percentage distributed locally, by state, regionally, and nationally are provided also. Negative CIT changes indicate an increase in CIT over time. Allocation: percentage of kidneys procured by the donor service area, transplanted locally, statewide, regionally, and nationally. CIT, cold ischemic time; TN, Tennessee; NC, North Carolina; PA, Pennsylvania; WI, Wisconsin; FL, Florida; CA, California; NY OH, Ohio; TX, Texas.
Regional allocation includes all kidneys allocated to the United Network of Organ Sharing region of procurement, excluding kidneys allocated within the state of procurement.