Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 15;2014:961679. doi: 10.1155/2014/961679

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis model estimates for percent breast density (%-G), fibroglandular tissue volume (GV), fat tissue volume (FV), and total breast volume (TV) measured by five different methods (n = 320).

Explanatory variable Standardized β-estimates (SE)
%-G GV FV TV
BMI −0.62 (0.02)∗∗∗ 0.03 (0.03) 0.79 (0.02)∗∗∗ 0.71 (0.02)∗∗∗
Age −0.03 (0.2) −0.01 (0.02) −0.02 (0.02) −0.02 (0.02)
Age at menarche 0.03 (0.2) 0.03 (0.02) 0.01 (0.02) 0.02 (0.02)
Pregnancy, completed
 Zero Reference
 One −0.08 (0.08) −0.002 (0.1) 0.18 (0.07)∗ 0.16 (0.07)∗
 Two −0.24 (0.07)∗∗ −0.37 (0.08)∗∗∗ 0.005 (0.06) −0.14 (0.06)∗
 Three and more −0.41 (0.07)∗∗∗ −0.69 (0.08)∗∗∗ −0.12 (0.06)∗ −0.35 (0.06)∗∗∗
Measurement methoda,b
 HSM Reference
 GE −0.003 (0.06) −0.01 (0.07) 0.002 (0.05) 0 (0.05)
 MATH 0.01 (0.06) 0.01 (0.07) 0.001 (0.05) 0 (0.05)
 3DGRE 0.002 (0.06) −0.003 (0.07) 0.003 (0.05) 0 (0.06)
 STIR 0.03 (0.06) 0.01 (0.08) −0.02 (0.05) −0.02 (0.06)
Race and ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White race Reference
 Hispanic race 0.16 (0.05)∗∗ 0.33 (0.06)∗∗∗ −0.12 (0.04)∗∗ 0.01 (0.04)
 African-American race 0.47 (0.06)∗∗∗ 0.39 (0.08)∗∗∗ −0.22 (0.05)∗∗∗ −0.05 (0.06)
Model R 2 0.38 0.09 0.58 0.51

aHSM, histogram segmentation method; FFDM, full field digital mammography unit; MATH, mathematical algorithm; 3DGRE, 3D gradient echo; STIR, short tau inversion recovery.

bInteraction terms between predictors and measurement methods were all not significant (results not shown).

***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05.