Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2014 Apr 18;257:186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.008

Table 6.

Categorical separation of animals by level of transplant integration.

Category Animal # Description of transplant Transplant method
6, 8, 15, 17, 19, 20, 27, 29, 30 Transection only N/A
1 3, 18 Graft integrated at rostral and caudal ends with some complete bridging Method 1 (3)
Method 2 (18)
2 16, 24, 25, 28 Graft integrated at rostral and caudal sites, partition present but
no or minimal non-neural boundary zone		 Method 2
3 7, 10, 12, 22, 23, 26, 31, 32 Graft integrated at rostral and caudal sites ; partition present with non-neural
zone		 Method 1 (10, 12)
Method 2 (7, 22, 23, 26, 31, 32)
4 1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 13 Extensive cavitation and/or poor integration Method 1

Bold data represents animals who recieved transplant Method 1.