Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014:253787. doi: 10.1155/2014/253787

Table 2.

Number of samples ANN training performance AP + ANN training performance Performance comparison after AP
Indoor Outdoor Training time (sec.) Number of epochs∗ AP clustering time (sec.) Total training time (sec.) Number of epochs∗ Training time decreases (%) Number of epochs decreases (%)
5 10 1.5165 21 0.2885 0.7647 13 49.57 38.09
6 11 1.5655 21 0.3633 0.8257 14 47.25 33.33
7 12 1.6221 22 0.3921 0.9071 14 44.07 36.36
8 13 1.6416 23 0.4172 0.934 15 43.10 34.78
9 14 1.6443 24 0.4226 0.9504 16 42.20 33.33
10 15 1.6504 26 0.4244 0.9611 16 41.76 38.46
11 16 1.6541 26 0.439 0.9803 17 40.73 34.61
12 17 1.6669 27 0.4461 0.9848 18 40.92 33.33
13 18 1.6709 27 0.4556 0.9951 19 40.44 29.62
14 19 1.6801 28 0.4671 0.9951 19 40.77 32.14
15 20 1.6819 28 0.4702 0.9964 19 40.75 32.14
16 21 1.688 29 0.4704 0.9982 19 40.86 34.48
17 22 1.7322 30 0.4997 1.0017 21 42.17 30
18 23 1.7767 31 0.5073 1.0397 22 41.48 29.03
19 24 1.7966 32 0.5234 1.0695 22 40.47 31.25
20 25 1.7996 34 0.5484 1.0511 22 41.59 35.29

*The fraction values of the epochs are expressed by the nearest integer values.