Skip to main content
editorial
. 2006 Mar 7;12(9):1416–1420. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i9.1416

Table 3.

Summaries of the previous reports and this study on overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in differentiating non-neoplastic lesions from neoplastic ones

Author Method Number of lesions Overall accuracy ( % ) Sensitivity ( % ) Specificity ( % ) PPV1 ( % ) NPV2 ( % )
Chapius Ordinary 120 82.5 84.5 77.7 89.8 68.3
Neale Ordinary 181 80.2 69.2 85.4 69.2 85.5
Konishi Ordinary 407 68 90 61 94.4 85.1
Fu Ordinary 206 84.0 88.8 67.4 93.4 63.3
Eisen Chromoendoscopy 480 82.1 82 82 75 88
Kiesslich Chromoendoscopy 283 92.6 92.4 93.2 97.5 81
Fu Chromoendoscopy 206 89.3 93.1 76.1 93.1 76.1
Axelard Magnifying 55 94.5 92.9 95.1 86.7 97.5
Togashi Magnifying 923 88.4 92 73.3 94.2 85.2
Tung Magnifying 175 80.6 93.8 64.6 76.3 89.5
Liu Magnifying 954 86.1 90.8 72.7 90.4 73.6
Konishi Magnifying 405 92 97 100 96.3 86.5
Fu Magnifying 206 95.6 96.3 93.5 98.1 87.8
Hurlstone Magnifying 1008 95 98 92 95 96
This study Magnifying 210 99.1 92 100 100 99.8
1

PPV: positive predictive value,

2

NPV: negative predictive value