Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2006 Oct 10;281(49):37697–37704. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608375200

TABLE 1.

Differences and similarities between dark-adapted mice from different Rdh12 genetic backgrounds

Rdh12+/+ Rdh12+/− Rdh12−/−
pmol/eye pmol/eye pmol/eye
Rhodopsina
 6-week-old 480.3 ± 25.8 493.3 ± 25.9 487.4 ± 28.8

Rdh12+/+ Rdh12+/− Rdh12−/−

pmol/eye pmol/eye pmol/eye
A2Eb
 6-week-old NDc ND ND
 6-month-old 5.89 ± 0.48 8.11 ± 1.13 10.51 ± 1.78
 12-month-old 11.00 ± 0.17 17.74 ± 0.20 22.03 ± 1.10

Rdh12+/+ Rdh12+/− Rdh12−/−

min min
Meta II decayd
 6-week-old 30.6 27.8

Expression level (retina)e Rdh12+/+ Rdh12−/− Rdh8−/−

Relative quantification Relative quantification Relative quantification
 RDH12 1 0.00 1.00
 RDH8 1 1.01 0.00
a

Mice were dark-adapted for more than 48 h. The results are presented with S.E., and n was between 3 and 5. Rhodopsin and retinoids were measured as described under “Materials and Methods.”

b

A2E was measured as described under “Materials and Methods.” The results are presented with S.E., and n was between 3 and 5.

c

ND, not detected.

d

Meta II decay (n = 3) was examined as described under “Materials and Methods.”

e

Quantitative PCR was carried out in the DNA Sequencing and Real-time PCR Core (Department of Orthopedics, Case Western Reserve University).