Table A1. Stimuli Used in Experiments 1 and 3.
| Verbal label | Percentage producing target label in response to the nonverbal cue |
Imagery concordancea |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Label cues | Sound cues | ||
| n | 17 | 13 | 13 |
| Car (automobile) | 94 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Cat | 100 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Cow | 100 | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| Dog | 100 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
| Frog | 100 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Gun | 59 | 4.4 | 2.3 |
| Motorcycleb | 65 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
| Rooster | 94 | 3.5 | 4.3 |
| Train (locomotive) | 88 | 3.2 | 4.2 |
| Whistle | 88 | 3.3 | 4.3 |
Note. All sounds can be downloaded from http://sapir.psych.wisc.edu/stimuli/labelsSoundsExpl.zip
a
Participants answered the question “How well did the picture match the image you thought of?” using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = did not match at all; 5 = matched perfectly).
b
The motorcycle item was omitted from Experiments 3A-3B.