Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2007 Apr 12;93(0):169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.02.018

Table 4.

Agreement characteristics between the ‘proxy’ measures and the actual Deficit Syndrome status. Characteristics include percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate and kappa.

UNDER ESTIMATE OVER ESTIMATE
Variable Cases Agree. Sen. Spec. False Positives kappa Cases Agree. SEN. SPEC. False Positives Kappa
PDS1 36 78.2% 52.3% 88.4% 11.6% .43 51 73.7% 61.4% 78.6% 21.4% .38
PDS2 29 80.2% 47.7% 92.9% 7.1% .45 61 81.5% 86.4% 79.5% 20.5% .59
Blunted Affect 23 81.4% 43.2% 96.4% 3.6% .46 54 77.0% 70.5% 79.5% 20.5% .47
Emotional With. 17 71.1% 18.2% 92.0% 8.0% .13 50 75.6% 63.6% 80.4% 19.6% .42
Factor 2 42 75.7% 54.5% 83.9% 16.1% .39 59 78.8% 79.5% 78.6% 21.4% .53
DSCAT 42 79.5% 61.4% 86.6% 13.4% .49
PROXYDS 44 78.2% 52.3% 88.4% 11.6% .43
PANSS Negative 45 77.6% 61.4% 83.9% 16.1% .45

NB: Factor 2, DSCAT, PROXYDS, and the PANSS Negative cutpoints predicted estimates close to the actual N of 44 cases with Deficit Syndrome, therefore only one estimate was used.