Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2007 Apr 12;93(0):169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.02.018

Table 5.

Results of the Logistic Regression Analysis predicting to Deficit Syndrome status (coded as 0 = DS negative, 1 = DS positive). Gender and education were entered at the first step as control covariates, and all other Proxy and PANSS measures were forward stepped into the Logistic Regression.

Variables in the Equation at the final step
Variable B S.E. Wald Sig. Exp (B) 95% CI
Gender −.799 .484 2.73 .099 .450 .174–1.161
Education −.169 .079 4.56 .033 .845 .724–.986
PDS1 .626 .139 20.19 .000 1.870 1.42–2.45
PANSS Negative .105 .030 12.40 .000 1.111 1.04–1.17
PANSS Dysthymia .299 .106 7.93 .005 1.349 1.09–1.66