Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014:194614. doi: 10.1155/2014/194614

Table 2.

Time complexity analysis of methods compared in Figures 10 and 11 in terms of CPU time/s.

Figures Proposed method Zhang et al. method Li et al. method Chan et al. method Number of iterations
Figure 10 24.25 41.92 32.34 11.81 500
Figure 11(a) 7.56 13.66 16.48 18.73 150
Figure 11(f) 25.77 43.52 51.69 34.94 400
Figure 11(k) 82.44 117.53 151.39 65.34 600