Table 7.

Comparison of classification accuracies with the state-of-the-art methods that used multimodal neuroimaing for AD/MCI vs. NC.

Methods	Subjects (AD/MCI/NC)	Modality	AD vs. NC (%)	MCI vs. NC (%)
Kohannim et al., 2010	40/83/43	MRI+PET+CSF	90.7	75.8
Hinrichs et al., 2011	48/119/66	MRI+PET	92.4	n/a
Zhang et al., 2011	51/99/52	MRI+PET+CSF	93.2	76.4
Westman et al., 2012	96/162/111	MRI+CSF	91.8	77.6
Liu et al., 2013	51/99/52	MRI+PET	94.37	78.80
Proposed method	51/99/52	MRI+PET+CSF	96.18	81.45

The boldface denotes the best performance in each classification task.