Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 23;5:4213. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5213

Figure 3. Finding the ground state of He–H+ for a specific molecular separation R=90 pm.

Figure 3

(a) Experimentally computed energy ‹Inline graphic› (coloured dots) as a function of the optimization step j. The colour represents the tangle (degree of entanglement) of the physical state, estimated directly from the state parameters Inline graphic. The red lines indicate the energy levels of Inline graphic(R). The optimization algorithm clearly converges to the ground state of the molecule, which has small but non-zero tangle. The crosses show the energy calculated at each experimental step, assuming an ideal quantum device. (b) Overlap |‹ψj|ψG› between the experimentally computed state |ψj› at each optimization step j and the theoretical ground state of Inline graphic, |ψG›. Error bars are smaller than the data points. Further details are provided in the Methods section, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Methods.