Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 31;5:4463. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5463

Figure 3. Analytical theory compared with simulations.

Figure 3

Using a single set of model parameters, our theory (equation (17), solid lines) provides an accurate global approximation to both slow (a) and fast (c) external force protocols (as compared with the intramolecular relaxation timescale, Inline graphic in our case), apart from a narrow range (b) close to a critical loading rate (Inline graphicc≈105 pN s−1 for our choice of parameters). The ‘experimental’ rupture force histograms have been generated by direct stochastic integration (see Methods section), using Inline graphic=10 × kBT, T=300 K, xb=1 nm, D=1,000 nm2 s−1 and Inline graphic=1…1011 pN s−1. Our best-fit parameters obtained with equation (17) are =10.15 × kBT, xb=0.98 nm, D=976 nm2 s−1. Since the mean rupture force varies by orders of magnitude at large loading rates, we use double-logarithmic scaling for Inline graphic>107 pN s−1 (c).