Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;4(5):199–210. doi: 10.1177/2042098613499790

Table 1.

Impact of excluding self-reported events on the effects of calcium with or without vitamin D on the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke.

Trials (n) Myocardial infarction
Stroke
Hazard ratio/relative risk (95% CI) p Hazard ratio/relative risk (95% CI) p
Calcium monotherapy
Patient-level data
All studies 5 1.31 (1.02–1.67) 0.035 1.20 (0.96–1.50) 0.11
 Excluding self reports 4 1.44 (1.08–1.91) 0.013 1.20 (0.91–1.59) 0.19
Trial-level data
Studies with complete data 8 1.27 (1.01–1.59) 0.038 1.12 (0.92–1.36) 0.25
 With Prince study coding data 8 1.25 (0.99–1.57) 0.061 1.17 (0.96–1.43) 0.12
 Excluding self reports 6 1.33 (1.03–1.73) 0.030 1.18 (0.93–1.50) 0.18
Calcium with/without vitamin D
Patient-level data
All studies 6 1.26 (1.07–1.47) 0.005 1.19 (1.02–1.39) 0.026
 Excluding self reports 5 1.29 (1.10–1.52) 0.002 1.19 (1.01–1.41) 0.04
Trial-level data
Studies with complete data 9 1.24 (1.07–1.44) 0.004 1.15 (1.00–1.32) 0.055
 With Prince study coding data 9 1.23 (1.06–1.43) 0.006 1.18 (1.02–1.36) 0.026
 Excluding self reports 7 1.26 (1.08–1.48) 0.004 1.18 (1.01–1.38) 0.038

For analyses that include Prince study coding data, we updated the data provided by the authors from their trial [Prince et al. 2006] with their subsequent secondary analysis using coding data [Lewis et al. 2011, 2012a]. CI, confidence interval.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure