Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2013 Dec 10;35(4):335–341. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23509

Table 1.

Comparison between LEAP and FREAD for the FREAD dataset.

Loop Length The average (median) of 30 loops
FREADa The average of 10 predictions by LEAP The lowest-energy prediction of 10 by LEAP
4 1.29 0.40 (0.23) 0.39 (0.23)
5 2.19 0.43 (0.30) 0.40 (0.27)
6 1.79 0.55 (0.37) 0.49 (0.33)
7 2.53 0.79 (0.45) 0.69 (0.38)
8 2.88 0.98 (0.74) 0.68 (0.56)
9 3.08 1.20 (0.89) 0.93 (0.69)
10 4.25 1.76 (1.07) 1.44 (0.84)
11 4.55 2.56 (1.42) 2.24 (1.08)
12 3.99 3.68 (2.92) 3.14 (2.52)
13 5.54 3.37 (3.12) 2.91 (2.62)
14 6.07 5.10 (4.31) 4.44 (3.70)
15 6.41 5.16 (4.30) 4.58 (4.16)
16 7.50 5.33 (4.68) 4.90 (4.43)
17 7.84 6.84 (6.27) 5.66 (5.50)
18 5.48 7.60 (6.86) 6.53 (6.30)
19 7.67 7.04 (6.52) 5.87 (4.64)
20 7.64 9.01 (8.53) 8.21 (7.82)
a

The results were obtained from ref.39