Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 23;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-99

Table 4.

Differences in 6-sec RAP-values between Signals 1 and 2

Pat ID
N (6-sec RAP observations)
Differences in RAP between Signals 1 and 2 (N,%)
    0.2 0.4 0.6
1
73,005
18,935 (26%)
5,907 (8%)
1,981 (3%)
2
42,162
24,602 (58%)
13,710 (33%)
7,173 (17%)
3
206,708
17,604 (9%)
4,773 (2%)
1,793 (1%)
4
78,874
6,387 (8%)
938 (1%)
255
5
43,936
1,162 (3%)
250 (1%)
81
6
43,888
8,145 (19%)
2,288 (5%)
727 (2%)
7
126,768
8,545 (7%)
2,939 (2%)
1,205 (1%)
8
149,625
52,031 (35%)
31,938 (21%)
17,830 (12%)
9
167,244
37,871 (23%)
19,370 (12%)
11,763 (7%)
10
141,358
6,485 (5%)
1,015 (1%)
345
11
59,520
2,205 (4%)
527 (1%)
161
12
123,382
742 (1%)
127
57
13
54,411
15,663 (29%)
4,065 (7%)
1,069 (2%)
14
83,498
9,689 (12%)
2,793 (3%)
1,142 (1%)
15
220,276
31,022 (14%)
7,126 (3%)
1,677 (1%)
16 112,345 14,299 (13%) 2,657 (2%) 601 (1%)

RAP: correlation coefficient (R) between the intracranial pressure (ICP) wave amplitude (A) and the mean ICP level (P).