Skip to main content
. 2014 May 21;34(8):1328–1339. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.87

Table 2A. Bivariate analysis—Influence of DAT genotype on binding potential.

DAT genotype CSF corrected SRTM2 CFT: TBI
CSF corrected SRTM2 CFT: control
  9-carriers (N=6)
10/10 (N=5)
9-carriers (N=5)
10/10 (N=8)
  Mean BP±s.e.m. Mean BP±s.e.m. P-value Mean BP±s.e.m. Mean BP±s.e.m. P-value
Caudate 2.877±0.324 4.777±0.521 0.011 5.429±0.139 4.826±0.222 0.073
Putamen 2.760±0.203 3.674±0.173 0.009 4.966±0.319 4.478±0.182 0.178
Striatum 2.884±0.272 3.449±0.342 0.229 3.922±0.367 3.916±0.320 0.991
DRD2 genotype A1-carriers (N=7)
A2/A2 (N=5)
A1-carriers (N=6)
A2/A2 (N=7)
  Mean BP±s.e.m. Mean BP±s.e.m. P-value Mean BP±s.e.m. Mean BP±s.e.m. P-value
Caudate 4.249±0.541 2.850±0.311 0.101 4.956±0.307 5.145±0.118 0.591
Putamen 3.471±0.222 2.657±0.172 0.034 4.610±0.256 4.713±0.250 0.779
Striatum 3.233±0.334 2.980±0.243 0.614 4.491±0.291 3.428±0.231 0.014

BP, binding potential; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DAT, dopamine transporter; DRD2, D2 receptor gene; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Bold entries are made for P-values representing comparisons that are statistically significant.