Table 3.
Comparison of Post-Intervention Impressions in Intervention and Control Arms.
Post-Intervention Perception* | Intervention (N = 410) | Control (N = 386) | Cohen’s d | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
The instructor was knowledgeable | 2.23 | 2.23 | 0.00 | .94 |
I learned a lot during this program | 2.21 | 2.11 | 0.13 | .08 |
I enjoyed this program | 2.05 | 1.91 | 0.18 | .01 |
I would like more programs like this one | 1.95 | 1.85 | 0.13 | .08 |
I would recommend this program to a friend | 1.92 | 1.86 | 0.07 | .26 |
I participated in this program | 1.94 | 1.83 | 0.14 | .06 |
This program kept my attention | 2.01 | 1.78 | 0.29 | <.001 |
I am less likely to smoke now that I have seen this program | 2.17 | 2.05 | 0.14 | .06 |
This program would be effective in getting kids not to smoke | 2.00 | 1.88 | 0.14 | .04 |
I will look at smoking differently from now on | 2.07 | 1.87 | 0.23 | .001 |
I will look at advertising differently from now on | 2.09 | 1.86 | 0.26 | <.001 |
Post-intervention perceptions were scored with continuous figures from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree).